Countdown to the Election

Position Paper

Grading Ordinance

This paper is being written to explain my position with respect to regulating grading on public and private lands within the unincorporated areas of Merced County. My limited research on the topic leads me to believe that a grading ordinance would establish standards for grading, including filling and excavation activities, and for the construction of in-ground structures in order to:

1.      Minimize hazards to life and property (such as airborne particulate matter);

2.      Protect against soil erosion and the degradation of watercourses from nutrients, sediments or other earth materials;

3.      Protect the safety, use and stability of public rights-of-way and drainage courses;

4.      Protect drainage courses and watercourses from obstruction, and protect life and property from the destructive effects of flooding;

5.      Protect fish, wildlife and their habitats and promote the retention and restoration of riparian (riverbank) vegetation;

6.      Protect against the destruction of cultural resources and human burials.

7.      Ensure that the intended use of a graded site would be consistent with the Merced County General Plan and any applicable specific plan.

Some of the disadvantages include:

1.      Construction or project delays consistent with the evaluation, approval, and permitting process.

2.      Costs to the County for management and enforcement of such an ordinance.

3.      Cost and time of litigation around issues relating to such an ordinance.

Based upon my understanding of the issue at this time, it would make sense to support an effort to create such an ordinance. I would always be willing to listen to arguments “for” and “against” such an ordinance and would rely heavily on my professional negotiation and problem solving skills to help our community come to agreement.

Thank you for the opportunity to address the issue!

John S. Alexander

Candidate for Merced County Supervisor,

District Two